Press Release: Senate Passage of Bill to Join International Treaty to Cut Toxic Ship Pollution Praised by Leading Environmental Group
| Inside the Life of a Scrapped Auto Many people do not know that automobiles are one of today’s most recycled commodities. Steel and iron make up about 65 percent of the average vehicle, and are extremely valuable. Each year, the steel industry recycles more than 14 million tons of steel from end-of-life vehicles. Several other metals and materials from cars may also be recycled. |
| Kenya court halts $370m sugar, biofuels project A Kenyan court has temporarily halted a $370 million sugar and biofuels project in a coastal wetland that conservation groups warned would threaten wildlife and local livelihoods. The government and the country’s biggest sugar miller, Mumias, wants to plant cane on 20,000 hectares in the Tana River Delta to create jobs and plug an annual 200,000-tonne sugar deficit. |
| Press Release: Senate Passage of Bill to Join International Treaty to Cut Toxic Ship Pollution Praised by Leading Environmental Group
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:
Janea Scott – (213) 223-2186 or jscott@edf.org
Sean Crowley – (202) 550-6524-c or scrowley@edf.org
(Washington, D.C. – June 27, 2008) The U.S. Senate last night passed, by unanimous consent, legislation that will allow the U.S. to join an international treaty that could dramatically cut ocean ship pollution that causes tens of thousands of global deaths annually. “The Marine Pollution Prevention Act of 2008” (H.R. 802), was passed overwhelmingly by the U.S. House of Representatives last year.
“This action could be a sea change that ultimately helps steer us to cleaner, healthier air for the millions of Americans harmed by toxic air pollution from U.S. and foreign-flagged ships,” said Janea Scott, a senior attorney for Environmental Defense Fund based in Los Angeles. “This action will help our country secure protective international standards for large ocean-going ships. We urge our government to immediately complete the critical process of ratifying the MARPOL treaty.”
Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, commonly known as “MARPOL,” is an international treaty that governs air pollution from large ocean-going ships.
Large ocean-going ships are a major source of soot, sulfur dioxide and smog-forming pollution that are associated with premature deaths, hospital visits, and asthma attacks that exact a heavy toll on human health for millions of Americans. About ninety percent of the ships that dock at U.S. ports are foreign-flagged international vessels.
Shipping-related soot emissions contribute to approximately 60,000 global deaths annually, with impacts concentrated in coastal regions on major trade routes.
The U.S. government has proposed protective measures for international adoption as part of the MARPOL treaty that would achieve vital progress in reducing the high emissions from these ships. This clean air blueprint will be considered at a key meeting of the International Maritime Organization in October. |
| Green Jobs Act, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant The website 1sky.org reports thatCongress is now deciding which federal programs will be funded in 2009. Among those programs are the Green Jobs Act, which would invest $125 million in green-collar job training programs, and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant, which would authorize grants to local communities to help improve their energy efficiency [.] |
| The Triac: An Affordable Electric Car California based company Green Vehicles recently began selling an affordable $20,000 electric car called the Triac. The small but efficient 3-wheeled car has a range of 120 miles and can travel up to 70mph on the highway. Charging the lithium-ion batteries that power the 20kw electric motor takes about 6 hours, and there is [.] |
| EU Considers Dumping Biofuels While U.S. Continues to Bully Global South to Adopt Gene-Altered Crops European Union energy ministers said at an informal meeting Saturday they had been labouring for 18 months under the false impression that an EU plan to fight global warming included an obligation to develop controversial biofuels.What seems to be a stunning misreading on the part of policymakers in Brussels comes at a time when the image of biofuels has shifted over a matter of a months from climate saviour to climate pariah. |
| Poll: Which Candidate is the Greenest? All three presidential nominees for the upcoming 2008 US elections are promising that they can end America’s addition to oil through the research and development of green energy technologies. They claim that developing alternative energies will create jobs and turn the economy around, while helping to stop global warming and the national security issues [.] |
| Press Release: EPA Chief Publically Slams Door on Today’s Solutions to Address Global Warming
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contacts:
Tony Kreindler – (202) 572-3378, (202) 210-5791 (cell) or akreindler@edf.org
Vickie Patton – (720) 837-6239 or vpatton@edf.org
Dr. Nathaniel Keohane – (212) 616-1271 or nkeohane@edf.org
(Washington, DC – July 11, 2008) Today, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publicly refused to address global warming pollution despite a 2007 Supreme Court decision affirming EPA’s broad power to act under the nation’s clean air laws.
Instead, EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson defiantly slammed the door on meaningful action in the nation’s fight against global warming during the remainder of the current administration.
“This administration has turned its back on a golden economic opportunity, choosing instead to keep walking the path of costly delay,” said Nathaniel Keohane, PhD, EDF director of economic policy and analysis. “EPA’s own analysis says reducing heat-trapping pollution from motor vehicles would ultimately save American consumers over a hundred billion dollars a year at the gas pump.”
A May 30, 2008 leaked version of the EPA document estimated that cutting greenhouse gases from motor vehicles would result in net benefits as high as $2 trillion dollars, in present value terms, over the next three decades. Those estimates take into account the costs of the regulation, and include fuel savings to consumers as well as the economic benefits from reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The final draft released today, however, leaves out the benefits of addressing global warming, and assumes that gasoline prices will be just over $2 per gallon for the period 2010-2020. As a result, today’s analysis radically diminishes the value of action and instead states that the “net present value to society could be on the order of $340 to $830 billion without considering benefits of GHG reductions.” (Pages 239-240)
The document nonetheless confirms the unequivocal authority of the agency to take meaningful action to address climate change, including the use of a cap and trade system to cost-effectively cut emissions.
“It’s up to the next President, regardless of party, to move forward where this administration has denied the science and defied the law,” said Steve Cochran, Director of the National Climate Campaign at EDF. “By working with Congress to enact a national climate policy while moving forward aggressively under existing law, he can reap the economic and environmental benefits shown by every credible analysis, including EPA’s.”
Background
Supreme Court Decision and EPA’s Broken Commitment to Respond
On April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the EPA’s refusal to address global warming pollution under the Clean Air Act, finding that the statute clearly empowered EPA to address greenhouse gas emissions. In an opinion written by Justice John Paul Stevens, the high Court instructed EPA to determine whether global warming pollution endangers human health or welfare and, if so, to establish greenhouse gas emission standards for motor vehicles.
In the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court decision, EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson repeatedly enunciated a commitment to take action. Johnson testified before a November 2007 Congressional Committee hearing: "The EPA plans to address the issue of endangerment when we propose regulations on greenhouse gas emissions for motor vehicles and fuels later this year." "EPA is firmly committed to addressing the long-term challenge of global climate change." To carry out the Administrator’s commitment, some 60 to 70 EPA officials were working on corrective action in response to the Supreme Court decision.
But on March 27th the EPA Administrator reversed course and informed Congressional leaders that EPA will take no meaningful action in response to the Supreme Court. Today Johnson disparaged the nation’s clean air laws, defied the Supreme Court and closed the door on EPA action to address greenhouse gases in the current Administration.
Leaked Draft Estimates Trillions of Dollars in Net Benefits Due to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cuts
But a May 30th leaked version of the document propounded today shows the extraordinary benefits to society of reducing greenhouse gases from motor vehicles. The draft estimates net benefits from EPA’s proposed approach of $0.5 to $2 trillion dollars in present value terms through the year 2040. (The low end of the range discounts benefits and costs in future years at 7% per year, while the higher end of the range uses a 3% discount rate, giving more weight to future benefits.)
“Our work to date indicates that there are significant reductions of GHG emissions that could be achieved for passenger cars and light-duty trucks, up to 2020 and beyond, that would result in large net monetized benefits to society. For example, taking into account specific vehicle technologies that are likely to be available in that time period and other factors relevant to motor vehicle standard-setting under the CAA, EPA’s analysis suggests that substantial reductions can occur where the cost-per-ton of GHG reduced is more than offset by the value of fuel savings, and the net present value to society could be on the order of $0.5 to $2 trillion….” (EPA 5-30-08 DRAFT at p. 92, available from EDF contacts.)
Although EPA does not provide a precise breakdown of the benefits, the analysis notes that in the year 2040, the estimated economic benefits of reducing global warming pollution amount to $67 billion (for an estimated reduction of 635 million tons of CO2). This amounts to roughly one-quarter of the net benefits in that year, with the remainder representing savings at the gas pump.
The final draft released today, however, leaves out the benefits of addressing global warming, and assumes that gasoline prices will be just over $2 per gallon for the period 2010-2020. As a result, today’s analysis radically diminishes the value of action and instead states that the “net present value to society could be on the order of $340 to $830 billion without considering benefits of GHG reductions.” (Pages 239-240)
###
About Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Defense Fund is at the forefront of an innovation revolution, developing new solutions that protect the natural world while growing the economy. Founded in 1967 and representing more than 500,000 members, the group creates powerful economic incentives by working with market leaders and relying on rigorous science. For more information, visit edf.org.
|
| Denvers Climate Plan In-Depth: Voluntary Travel Offsets Here on the Greenprint blog, we’re taking a closer look at each of the 10 recommended strategies from Denver’s recently-released draft climate action plan. Today: an overview of Item 3, which suggests promoting programs for voluntary purchases of certified carbon offsets:“Provide the opportunity to pay a small voluntary fee, at the time of air ticket [.] |